Fugal · Frontier Scoreboard
SNAPSHOT 2026-07-04
MATRIX 320q · 17 models
Flagship parity at half the price.
The measured system: a router weighs each model's odds of getting the query right against its price; an LLM verifier accepts or escalates. (The shipping product routes once, verifier-free — its own e2e numbers are queued.) Plotted below: every model's measured accuracy against its real cost per query. Fugal lands at the flagship's accuracy for half the spend — and the honest read of the statistics is right here, not buried.
Fugal · live e2e
0.973acc
$0.0079 / query · n=110 fresh
vs gpt-5.5 flagship
2.1×cheaper
COST WIN · ROBUST
Accuracy vs flagship
+0.9pts
PARITY · NOT SIGNIFICANT
Verifier false-accept
3.4%
of accepts · trustworthy gate
Accuracy vs price
17 models · 320-question matrix · cost on a log scale
Score by
Fugal (product)
flagship / baseline
on Pareto frontier
dominated model
— frontier = no model is both more accurate and cheaper
Full standings
Ranked by matrix accuracy. Heat strip = per-domain accuracy (redder = weaker).
| Model | Accuracy | $ / query | Frontier | gsm8k | math500 | aime25 | humaneval | mmlupro |
|---|
domain accuracy
0.3 → 1.0